Blog

YA Saves, and It Saved Me

Thanks to one of the teachers I work with, I was clued into YA Saves yesterday, which gave me a bit of a heads up.

Honestly, people, I can’t turn my back to write one exploding watermelon story before things sort of go kablooey!

For those of you who need the Wall Street Journal article, it’s right here.

And Viable Paradise classmate Bo Balder points me to Kyle Cassidy’s very cogent response right here.

***

I will add a mere three brief points to the discussion.

1. My teen life was one of the worst YA novels you could write. A YA novel in my youth about incest could have saved me. Where was it? Because I believed in books that much. In some ways, I envy kids now. While the novels are dark, there’s that one kid going through the same situation mirrored in the novel. That gives that kid one more chance out of darkness.

2. I am concerned as an adult about the content of YA novels. But sheltering kids from the evils of the world does not prepare them for a world in which bad things could happen. A responsible parent sits kids down and talks to them. They know what their kids are reading.

To wit, the book I left my high school teaching job over–Robert Cormier’s The Chocolate War. There were two kinds of parents in that scenario–parents who could see the value of a book taught with careful adult supervision and parents who did not want their children to read the book because of interesting obstacles such as “eyeball rape.” (Not making that one up. It was my favorite complaint, and the one that has stuck with me over the years…) Which parents have done a better job raising empathetic children?

One conservative Christian parent honored me with the comment, “I can’t think of anyone I’d rather have my child discuss that book with than you, Catherine.” She understood that the content of the book was important for her child’s emotional and intellectual development. She wasn’t afraid to give her child a book that showed a darker side of life. You know, guiding a child through that sort of thing might be a parental responsibility.

So, I’m not saying turn kids lose on dark YA books. I am saying talk to your kids.

3. Supernatural stuff is horrible and scary. Sure. It’s also not real. There are loads of theories about how fairy tales are cathartic, as well as loads of theories about how children who are exposed to violence and/or the fantastic might emulate it. (Video games, Superman, and Wile E. Coyote have all born this burden).

Most kids know better. They can tell the difference between fantasy and reality. If they can’t, no YA book is at fault, and you should seek help for that child.

I found that the supernatural I encountered in my childhood books helped me hope. I sometimes imagined that I was the kidnapped child from a family that loved me. I sometimes I imagined I had come from another place. I never thought of these things in a delusional way, but they were ways to help me escape a difficult situation. I identified with Oliver Twist and David Copperfield, and imagined I was the princess raised by trolls.

I’m not sure I would have made it without those abilities to see my situation with hope. I’m not talking about anything as drastic as suicide, but books for young people made it possible for me to come out of a dark, dark childhood with the idea that I would be better because all those heroes and heroines in the books I loved overcame. I know not all books have an ending in which the heroes overcome. But enough did that I’m still here, and I’m still sane.

There are two sides to every coin. Could it be that dark YA could be used for good, as well as evil? Yes, I think so. With that in mind, then, I’d like to encourage the mother in the Journal article to actually know what her daughter is reading. Then she could have gone right to the shelf and gotten it, or asked someone about books that are similar. And she wouldn’t be worried about the influence of these books, because she would know what it was.

Catherine

How to Describe Nonwhite Characters Sans Fail

The rough draft for the as yet nameless watermelon story is in the bag, cooling off until a look tomorrow. It’s…strangely sensual for a watermelon story, so I guess I’ll play that up a bit.

***

But you’re here for some more panel reporting. Here’s a write up of How to Describe Nonwhite Characters Sans Fail.

The Cast:
Mary Doria Russell: Moderator, Tiptree Winner.

K. Tempest Bradford: Clarion participant, technical journalist.

Moondancer Drake: A multicultural LGBTQ paranormal novelist.

Amal El-Mohtar: Nebula nominee and poet.

Sumana Harihareswara: Editor, software specialist.

Snapshots of the Panel

The panelists suggested here is a good place to begin this discussion.

The panelists began discussing the following description. “Her skin was the color of a delicious Coca-Cola.”

And…we discovered that foods are often used to describe characters who are not white. After discussing food and Weird Al, it was decided that food was an easy describer for artists.

Characters in books are often imagined as white, as that has permeated the culture as standard, unless deviance is stated otherwise. This is uncomfortable and problematic.

Mary Doria Russell wrote a piece to demonstrate focusing on other descriptive traits than skin color for an example.

Some discussion occurred that juxtaposing elements both positive and negative, and using a wide variety of details beyond the superficial of appearance might be a good way to dig a little deeper.

It is important to be aware of the cultural assumptions, both positive and negative, of the things you write.

Having readers was described as important. Not having one token reader was also described as important–maybe having one black friend look at your book that has a black character in it isn’t a good enough strategy.

Writers should do the work and the research to make the best representation that they can, in tandem with those who know.

Some discussion was also given to dialogue and character action regarding the portrayal of POC.

***

As with the workshop on Mary Sue, there was a common theme that writers could dig a little deeper and make their writing more complex. This would solve a lot of the troubles. I begin to see this as the overall theme of the convention.

Under Construction

I’ll be working on the exploding Chinese watermelon story for however long it takes this weekend.

I decided last weekend to write it, and then decided I didn’t have time after Wiscon. But the deadline has been extended a week, and I think it’s a good idea, so I’m going to see if I can make the idea work.

Good experience–learning how to write a story under pressure.

Off to research how using plant hormones works.

Catherine

What’s the Matter with Mary Sue?

This panel was a discussion of Mary Sue as used in fan fiction, as the main character in any story, and as a feminist problem.

The Cast:

Sigrid J. Ellis: Moderator who directed traffic without seizing the conversation.

Laurel Amberdine: YA Author

James Frenkel: TOR Editor

Caroline Pruett: Comic book blogger and fiction craft podcaster

Heidi Waterhouse: Knows something about Mary Sue.

Snapshots from the discussion:

Continue reading “What’s the Matter with Mary Sue?”

One Thousand Ways to Die

This panel at Wiscon was bought to you by people who have been really injured and really work with injured people (TM).

The cast:

Alex Gurevich: Your moderator who asks probing and interesting questions.

Cassie Alexander: In her identity as Erin Cashier, she is a nurse.

Lisa C. Frietag: A real doctor, the kind who helps people.

Gary Kloster: Author and martial arts instructor. Has been in pain before.

Jake Kolojejchick: Avid reader and survivor of mountaineering accident.

Snapshots from the conversation:

When people get hurt, they stay down.

Fairly minor injuries can incapacitate you. However, no one wants to see the protagonist of a novel get bed rest for fifty pages or so.

Head injuries are the most problematic in books. A common plot device is knocking a character out and getting them to the bad guy’s lair. If you are hit so hard you are knocked out, you have much bigger problems than the bad guy.

Psychological consequences are often underplayed as well. Elizabeth Moon’s Paksenarion is an example of a character who was tortured and raped, and just got back up again.

HOWEVER, one of the ways that writers often get around these limitations are by writing about enhanced beings, or using a supernatural outside intervention.

First aid scenes are often not accurately recreated. CPR is kind of iffy. Shocking people is oversimplified. Most first aid scenarios leave a lot of litter from discarded packaging.

Does anyone do it right? Well, Jim Butcher’s Harry Dresden bitches a lot about pain, but since he’s enhanced, he keeps on going. A couple of audience folks thought Paksenarion’s lack of consequences was justified because of the intervention of her deity.

But no. Most writers don’t portray injury as accurately as they could, and it might be because that would be BORING.

So key is a balance between believability and story telling? Much depends on the kind of story you’re trying to tell.

Friday Night Social Life

Lest ye be gettin’ tired o’ the panels, let me regale you with tales of Friday night adventures.

This year at the gathering I hung out a little less than I usually do. But I did catch up with some friends, among them Lisa Cohen, Evelyn Brown and Margaret Ronald. It’s always good to see Evelyn, as we were in school together in the early 90s. Linguistics. Yay.

I was toting around the vintage hair book and sharing it. Margaret thinks we should have a vintage hair and make-up slumber party next year. We’ll have to hammer that out, but all I can say is start shopping for Dippity Do, and we’ll get back to you with the details.

***

Some Minnesota cool people snagged me for dinner, and we went to an Irish pub. We talked a lot about Scottish country dancing, which might be a weird conversation for some, but almost all of them were taking lessons, and two had become engaged to be married thanks to it. So, like the good Scots girl I am, this did not pose much difficulty for me.

***

After dinner, opening ceremonies. And after opening ceremonies. the usual Rabid Transit Karaoke and Dance Party. Which is cool. Because I am into karaoke like many of you are into dark chocolate. This year, Kristin Livdahl continued to man the reins, and her husband Alan DeNiro took over the mc responsibilities from Chris Barzak, who had to go to this little thing called the Nebulas. These guys really rock the planet, and we had a good time. I sang until I was hoarse.

And I had several partners in crime. Julia Rios hung out. Also Margaret and Evelyn. And tons of other cool new folks that I got to yell at for a spell.

Honestly, you really want to check out the karaoke party, if for no other reason than the chance to sing along and maybe dance. They do a great job every year. It’s one of the highlights of the convention for me.

***

So, then, I had to see a little of the sixth floor parties. I knew I would find Rachel Swirsky and her husband Mike at the FogCon party. Just as I stepped up, the folks they’d been talking to before took that as their cue to exit. But I noted the name tag of one of them was Scott Lynch. I blurted out how much I enjoyed his books and he stuck around to talk about the characters and how the books came about. There were also some Codexians in the group, along with Rachel and Mike, so overall it was a good conversation that lasted until 1 a.m.

So, some familiar gifts and some new surprises. Tomorrow, we’ll return to panels, focusing on panels about death and Mary Sue.

Catherine

Writers Doing Things You Wished You Were Doing

And…it’s break time. My brain needs to recoup just a wee bit before I hit the ELA Grammar goals and go to a credit card meeting. That means you get two posts today for the price of one.

Let’s go back to the beginning of the convention now. (Yes, I know that flashback could have been smoother). This is the post about readings I attended at the convention.

4 Writers, 4 Girls, 4 Worlds

This is the reading that I was part of. I read some of that Abigail Rath thing (it has a girl protagonist. That seemed the way to go.) Currently, Abigail Rath Versus the Blood Sucking Undead is about number 4 on the to-do list. Must go elsewhere for sparkles.

But I’m here to highlight other writers. Here we go.

Laurel Amberdine read the beginnings of a ya novel in which society experiences the fall out from magnetic flux constantly. One young woman can save the world and set society aright.

Derek Molata read an excerpt from the novel his agent is currently shopping. Alternative dimensions and emotional memory rebels set the stage for a surreal supernatural battle.

Holly McDowell read from a novel her agent is also shopping: In 1835, a gifted composer has inherited her grandfather’s genius, but she pretends her brother is the musical prodigy of the family.

Star Songs from Four Primates

Alan John DeNiro: In addition to being a great karaoke host, DeNiro read an excerpt from a supernatural humorous pirate piece.

Karen Joy Fowler shared her WIP about a primate and a child being raised together. Fascinating children’s POV in this, plus a recounting of the Banks children’s first encounter with Mrs. Corry in Mary Poppins.

Hiromi Goto read a short piece about technology versus the heart.

Mary Doria Russell read riveting words from her most recently published novel Doc.

Taboo IV: The Return of the Curse of the Creature’s Ghost

Cassie Alexander read a sex scene from her upcoming werewolf novel.

Vylar Kaftan read a couple of short stories. The one that sticks with me best is the one about the prospectors.

Time and tiredness have driven the actual story that Ann Leckie read from my head, but I remember liking it, and by way of apology, I point you here and recommend you read Hesperia and Glory, about which many good things have been written.

Nebula winner Rachel Swirsky‘s poem about relationships was startling,and dramatically read.

Goblin Girls and Bedlam Boys

C.S.E. Cooney made everyone topsy-turvy with her acerbic fairy tale sensibility.

Patty had two girlfriends in search of a box that lead them to the Abyss.

Shira Lipkin read from her WIP Cicatrice.

Shveta Thakrar read an excerpt of her story that will be appearing in Steam Powered Two.

Not quite as reading heavy as last year, but still some pretty good stuff! Check these folks, and their work out. I certainly am please that I did.

Catherine

Being a Resilient Writer

Let’s begin at the end of this Wiscon.

I had the good fortune of being on a panels with Eleanor Arnason, Kelly McCullough, and Sean Murphy. If all those names seem familiar to you, they should. I had the good fortune of being on a panel with three members of the same writing group, all of them at very different places in their career and in very different stances regarding writing.

Let’s introduce the cast:

Eleanor Arnason: Five novels, countless short stories, living legend luminary, Tiptree Award winner. Photo of her hanging out with Ursula LeGuin on her site. How cool is that?

Kelly McCullough: Hard-working fantasy and SF writer, Writers of the Future Winner, responsible for 200K words this year, and married to a physics professor. How cool is that?

Sean M. Murphy: Has sold his first short story, but is a newbie, much more like me. However, he has made a pro sale. How cool is that?

And you know me. A few stories published, one book published, all small press at this point. Rejections getting better all the time.

***

The name of the panel was “Being a Resilient Writer.” For a Monday morning, it was packed. While there were not too many Secrets of the Universe (TM), here are some truths that seemed to come out during the panel.

1. Writing initially is like hitting your head against a brick wall. (Kelly’s metaphor). And you wonder why you do it, because your head has more give than the bricks. Eventually, if you keep at it, the wall gives.

2. Anytime someone gives you an absolute about your writing (you’ll never sell; you shouldn’t write novels; your career is over), you shouldn’t listen. Eleanor gave examples of when she had listened, and how she has regretted it.

3. The resilient writer is flexible. Sean told the story of how one member of Wyrdsmiths had been told by her editor that no one was interested in her name any more, because she had sold few books. The author began writing under a different name.

4. I talked about finding time to write. After a lifetime of being too busy, I told everyone that I decided I wasn’t going to wait until I had finished…everything to write. Sit down, make x’s in your schedule, and get busy.

5. Many high numbers of rejection letters were touted. Everyone gets rejected. Still. Kelly told a story of a friend who talked to Ray Bradbury. The friend asked Ray about rejections and what he did with them. Ray pulled out an origami boulder and illustrated what he had done with the one he’d gotten that morning.

6. Eleanor, Sean, and Kelly talked about writing group support and how important it was to them. I too talked about this. We mentioned that a locale group like Wyrdsmiths is great. I talked about how much support I get from my Viable Paradise classmates. I mentioned workshops as an excellent way to meet writers. Also, Kelly mentioned the Online Writers Workshop and Critters.

7. We talked about places to send stories. We talked about contacts. I brought up duotrope.com and querytracker.net as great databases for short stories and agents (send them money!) Sean also mentioned how fast the market changes, and how important it is to stay current regarding where to submit and who’s agenting.

8. Kelly talked about what it’s like to not write. Most of us concurred that we wrote because we had to, even though sometimes it was quite the slog. Kelly writes to keep “the weirdness from leaking out.” Having experienced this phenomena myself, I know of what he speaks.

9. Kelly and I both gave examples of the skepticism of receiving an acceptance. Kelly mentioned he thought one of them was ads. I mentioned that I seemed to need to lose body parts before I got mine.

10. One of the audience members expressed her discouragement about getting older and not having publications. I told a story about a student who was 60 when she came back to school. Her goal was a degree in social work. She decided to do this because a friend told her she was going to be 60 anyway, so why not have something to show for it.

11. Eleanor talked about the changing nature of publication. This led to a discussion of ebooks, which was helpful and contemplative.

12. Ebooks in turn lead to a discussion about self-promotion. Kelly was not of the opinion that self-promotion converted to a lot of sales. I mentioned how some people were so into self-promotion that they sort of forgot to write the next book. Kelly mentioned that was how he actually did self-promotion, and it worked.

13. There was a discussion about how the market can sometimes do horrible things to you, even though you have accepted material. Like a book can close, a publisher can shut down, a market can NOT publish your story even though they’ve accepted it. It is the nature of the business. Grit your teeth and go forward.

14. All of us had some parting shot wisdom. I put in a plug for everyone remembering that they are a writer. I mentioned that my three fellow panelists were all obscure at some point, and that I was obscure. However, in order to become a writer, I must consider myself a writer, keep writing, and improve my game.

15. The Wyrdsmiths responded that reasons like these were exactly why they gave their first Wiscon Wyrdsmith party. Even though they hadn’t published as much as they wanted, they wanted to celebrate that they were writers.

***

Of course, if any of my fellow panelists see this link, please give me some of the pieces I’ve forgotten to edit in.

Catherine

Only Checking In

I’ve tried starting this post three times. My brain realizes that it’s been getting little sleep and that work wants to suck it dry right now, so it looks like I will NOT be regaling you with clever anecdotes from my convention experience. Not right now. Not today.

The weekend was an educational blur. I attended many practical and pragmatic writer sessions, with an emphasis on writing the other. I had some high moments which excited me about writing. I had some good meet ups with friends, and some great bonding with Dan and Lisa.

I felt I should have been home with Bryon frequently. He had an excellent visit with his parents this weekend, and that was great, but my concern about his state right now seems to work against my rational mind. I can expect this in spades on my Scandinavian trip, I think.

I’ll write a series of articles, but today, well today, you should just know that I’m back. And well. And bone tired. Some writers aren’t very good on 4-6 hours of sleep for 3 days in a row.

Catherine

Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?

Caveat: This is certainly not my most pressing writing issue. I would go so far to say that I doubt that it will ever be my most pressing writing issue.

***

There was a moment this year when I was making my plans to go to Wiscon, and there was the possibility of staying on the Governor’s Club level. I have always wanted to try this! I have always thought it would be fantastic to try to concierge, the bar, all the goodies. And I know that I would meet some fabulous writers who stay on the top floor. I’m at the point where I’d like to spend some time talking to folks about what it’s like to be a published author very involved in the industry, and I’m thinking that this happens a lot upstairs.

Not that it doesn’t happen downstairs. I think (in my rich fantasy life) that it happens a different way upstairs.

But life is complicated. You see, I attend Wiscon with two friends who are not aspiring writers. They are two of my oldest and dearest friends. This trip with them is a sacred pilgrimage. For me, it has become more about writing, but it also is the one big bonding trip we three take each year. As it is, I see them less than I used to, because they would, naturally, attend different programming choices, not being aspiring writers and all!

So, when the opportunity for the Governor’s Club room came up, I sprang on it. I discovered that the available room was a double. No problem. Trundle bed, I thought. And then we three were in, baybee! And I would have my cake for dual purposes.

If you can stay in the Governor’s Club, it’s not expected that you would exceed the specified number per room. Got it.

For a brief moment, my mind flitted over the idea of keeping the room downstairs and staying in the Governor’s Club by myself. Price (upcoming trip to Norway!) made me think twice about that. And a strange, vaguely collegiate piece of myself thought about sleeping on the floor, but that was discarded. That Bohemian lifestyle doesn’t even sound good any longer.

But here’s the real reason I didn’t take the Governor’s Club on by myself–how can I bond with my most excellent friends if I don’t room with them? I do want to know more about the life of authors, and I will. But I don’t think I can let my overarching career interest displace our traditional good time.

Next year, all three of us will be on the Governor’s level, and we’ll see if we like it. It looks like, for me, wise move or otherwise, that I’m okay with that. I’m not a schmoozer by nature. I am not good at strategically putting myself in a place where I might accidentally meet interesting people or make connections while sacrificing my integrity, which in this case called for me to stay with my friends and do what I do every year. Yeah, I know. Not very modern. Some might even say not strategic.

I guess if that means I will always be small potatoes writer, okay. I don’t think that’s the case, though. I think what I really need to do is write a good book, send it out, and hope for the organic process to kick in as I improve.

You know, I just don’t want to be fake, or plastic. I just want to be myself, with some good books published. There is no secret way to meet the right person and have opportunity by-pass a lot of the mileage on the road of hard work. That’s not what I expect on the top floor, so I am not heart-broken.

Next year, when you see me Governing, provided I can get my finger on the registration button at the right time this year, I’ll be drinking at the bar for myself, maybe with Dan and Lisa. I am, however, a happy and friendly person, and open to conversation. Whether you can do anything for me or not.

Catherine