<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Writer Tamago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cathschaffstump.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cathschaffstump.com</link>
	<description>Catherine Schaff-Stump: Fledgling Writer
</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paradise Icon by Catherine Schaff-Stump</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/22/paradise-icon/comment-page-1/#comment-9745</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Schaff-Stump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4884#comment-9745</guid>
		<description>Fixed!

Paradise Icon...not just for really conservative Republicans anymore!

Catherine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed!</p>
<p>Paradise Icon...not just for really conservative Republicans anymore!</p>
<p>Catherine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paradise Icon by Lisa Nohealani Morton</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/22/paradise-icon/comment-page-1/#comment-9744</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Nohealani Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4884#comment-9744</guid>
		<description>Sounds like an awesome idea, congrats (and good job!) making it happen!

But, er - a &quot;neo-con&quot; workshop? (From the main workshop page)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like an awesome idea, congrats (and good job!) making it happen!</p>
<p>But, er - a "neo-con" workshop? (From the main workshop page)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Mortal Coil by L. Jagi Lamplighter (Wright)</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/21/this-mortal-coil/comment-page-1/#comment-9742</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Jagi Lamplighter (Wright)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4868#comment-9742</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing that. I particularly liked &quot; but that doesn&#039;t mean she shouldn&#039;t have put forth any of the effort. That doesn&#039;t mean I shouldn&#039;t have spent time on the critiques. That doesn&#039;t mean that she was wrong to move toward this dream.&quot;

Bless you both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing that. I particularly liked " but that doesn't mean she shouldn't have put forth any of the effort. That doesn't mean I shouldn't have spent time on the critiques. That doesn't mean that she was wrong to move toward this dream."</p>
<p>Bless you both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Mortal Coil by J. Kathleen Cheney</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/21/this-mortal-coil/comment-page-1/#comment-9732</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Kathleen Cheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4868#comment-9732</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry you&#039;ve lost her.  I have lost a couple of students in the past, and it&#039;s never pleasant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sorry you've lost her.  I have lost a couple of students in the past, and it's never pleasant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Survivor by Ithilwen</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/16/survivor/comment-page-1/#comment-9728</link>
		<dc:creator>Ithilwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4853#comment-9728</guid>
		<description>Have I ever told you how proud I am of you, Cath?  You&#039;re one of the bravest people I&#039;ve ever met.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have I ever told you how proud I am of you, Cath?  You're one of the bravest people I've ever met.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Survivor by Erica</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/16/survivor/comment-page-1/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4853#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>*big hugs, nee-san* 

I just spent about 30-40 minutes going thorough the Project pics. I see strength in their eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*big hugs, nee-san* </p>
<p>I just spent about 30-40 minutes going thorough the Project pics. I see strength in their eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Earth 2 by J. Kathleen Cheney</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/15/earth-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9665</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Kathleen Cheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4851#comment-9665</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that they&#039;re  willing to let you step back.  ;o)

Sorry about the computer.  I can commiserate (obviously.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad that they're  willing to let you step back.  ;o)</p>
<p>Sorry about the computer.  I can commiserate (obviously.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Earth 2 by Steve Tait</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/15/earth-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9664</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Tait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4851#comment-9664</guid>
		<description>And grading English papers will reinforce just how good a writer she is comparitively . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And grading English papers will reinforce just how good a writer she is comparitively . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bush and Company Convicted of War Crimes in Kuala Lumpur by Catherine Schaff-Stump</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/14/bush-and-company-convicted-of-war-crimes-in-kuala-lumpur/comment-page-1/#comment-9652</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Schaff-Stump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4843#comment-9652</guid>
		<description>Just so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bush and Company Convicted of War Crimes in Kuala Lumpur by Sean Craven</title>
		<link>http://cathschaffstump.com/archives/2012/05/14/bush-and-company-convicted-of-war-crimes-in-kuala-lumpur/comment-page-1/#comment-9648</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathschaffstump.com/?p=4843#comment-9648</guid>
		<description>The only president I&#039;ve seen who didn&#039;t engage in some dubious military bloodshed, casual imprisonment, and other atrocities -- remember Paraquat? -- except for Ford.

He didn&#039;t have many opportunities, and I could be wrong about him. I had other concerns at the time...

But the presidency does not attract individuals I&#039;d regard as first-rate types. Frankly, Obama&#039;s as good as we&#039;ve gotten, and he&#039;s supported a lot of grisly stuff. At least he hasn&#039;t puked on any heads of state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only president I've seen who didn't engage in some dubious military bloodshed, casual imprisonment, and other atrocities -- remember Paraquat? -- except for Ford.</p>
<p>He didn't have many opportunities, and I could be wrong about him. I had other concerns at the time...</p>
<p>But the presidency does not attract individuals I'd regard as first-rate types. Frankly, Obama's as good as we've gotten, and he's supported a lot of grisly stuff. At least he hasn't puked on any heads of state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

